11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
|
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
|
-
+
-
+
|
* Third-party discussion forum and mailing list software tends to be
difficult to install, set up, and administer. Fossil Forums aim to
be as close to zero-configuration as is practical.
* Posts are stored in the Fossil repository using the same
[./fileformat.wiki | block chain technology] that Fossil uses to
store your check-ins, wiki documents, etc. Posts sync to clone
store your check-ins, wiki documents, etc. Posts sync to cloned
repositories in a tamper-proof fashion.
* Because of Fossil's [./delta_format.wiki | delta compression
technology], discussions add little space to the size of a cloned
technology], discussions add little to the size of a cloned
repository. Ten years of the SQLite project's discussions —
averaging 2 or 3 dozen posts per day — compress down to just
35 MB of space in a Fossil Forums repository.
* Fossil Forums use [https://sqlite.org/fts3.html | SQLite's powerful
FTS4 full-text search engine]. If your project currently uses a
mailing list for discussions, this means you are no longer reliant
|
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
|
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
|
them with other Fossil artifacts using short internal links: link
to forum threads from a [./tickets.wiki | ticket], link to a wiki
document from a forum post, etc. These links are internal and
managed by Fossil itself, so links never become invalid simply
because your third-party forum software or mailing list search
engine changed its URL scheme.
* Forum permissions use the same role-based access control mechanism
as Fossil itself.
* The forum uses the same role-based access control mechanism as
Fossil uses for all other accesses.
* Since Fossil has an [./fileformat.wiki | open and well-documented
file format], your discussion archives are truly that:
<em>archives</em>. You are no longer dependent on a third-party
piece of software or service sticking around. Should you choose to
stop using Fossil, you can easily extract your discussion traffic
for transfer to another system.
* Posts can be marked up using Fossil's existing [/md_rules |
Markdown] and [/wiki_rules | Wiki] markup languages. No longer must
you choose to restrict your discussion forums to plain text only
(good for security) or to allow HTML-formatted MIME email (good for
complex discussions). Fossil Forums provide <em>enough</em>
formatting without giving up security.
* Fossil forums integrate with third-party [mail transfer
agents][MTA]. If you've got mail service configured on the server
hosting your Fossil instance, it can send notifications of new
posts to interested forum users, complete with message content for
those that prefer to visit the forum only when they need to post
something.
* Because Fossil accepts forum posts only via the web UI, it is
inherently [./antibot.wiki | protected against bots].
[MTA]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_transfer_agent
<h2>Setting up a Fossil Forum</h2>
<h3>Permissions</h3>
Fossil forums use the same role-based access control mechanism as
|
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
|
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
|
into the block chain immediately without being held for moderation.
* <b>Moderate</b>: User gets buttons on posts which allow them to
either delete or approve posts held for moderation. User also gets
access to a page (<tt>/modreq</tt>) showing the list of pending
moderation tasks.
* <b>Administer</b>: User can grant <b>Write Trusted</b> permission
to another user, or revoke it. (Currently unimplemented.)
By default, no Fossil user has permission to use the forums except for
users with Setup and Admin capabilities, which get these as part of the
large package of other capabilities they get.
For public Fossil repositories that wish to accept new users without
involving a human, go into Admin → Access and enable the "Allow
users to register themselves" setting. You may also wish to give the
`anonymous` user category the Read Forum (2) and Write Forum (3)
capabilities: this allows people to post without creating an account
simply by solving [./antibot.wiki | a simple CAPTCHA].
For a private repository, you will likely wish to give the "23"
capability pair to the `reader` user category instead.
For either type of repository, you are likely to want to give at least
the Write Trusted (4) capability to the `developer` user category.
By following this advice, you should not need to tediously add
capabilities to individual accounts, except in atypical cases, such as
to grant the Moderate Forum capability (5) to an uncommonly
highly-trusted user.
<h3>Single Sign-On</h3>
If you choose to host your discussion forums within the same repository
as your other Fossil-managed content, you inherently have a single
sign-on system. Contrast a mailing list or a third-party forum system,
|